There at the moment are dozens of commentators who dissect “Q” posts – on message boards, in YouTube videos and on their personal pages – but the idea was first championed by a handful of people that worked together to stir discussion of the “Q” posts, finally pushing the theory on to bigger platforms and gaining followers – a strategy that proved to be the important thing to Qanon’s spread and the originators’ financial gain.

Rogers often posted memes about “liberal tears” as properly as the ludicrous claims that Democrats murdered kids and worshipped Satan – details similar to those that might ultimately kind the Qanon idea. Rogers has publicly denied that he is the writer of the “Q” posts, though his last seen Fb put up, printed on Aug. 2, hinted that he would possibly someday be related to the theory. Rogers’ Facebook updates waned after Trump took office but began up once more within the fall, when he began posting “Q” messages to each confused and supportive household and mates.

Some YouTube channels, like one named Unirock, are principally devoted to poring over Patriots’ Soapbox livestreams and dissecting purported slip-ups. One archived livestream appears to show Rogers logging into the 8chan account of “Q.”The Patriots’ Soapbox feed rapidly cuts out after the login attempt. “Sorry, leg cramp,” Rogers says, earlier than the feed reappears seconds later. Users in the associated chatroom begin to wonder if Rogers had by chance revealed his identification as Q. “How did you submit as Q?

Barack Hussein Obama

Qanon,’” Rogers wrote, a reference to a CNN segment that mistakenly referred to the web site 4chan as a hacker. Following a request for remark from NBC News, Rogers deleted every submit on his Fb profile after 2014. Following one other message from a reporter informing him that NBC News had archived his web page, he deleted his Fb account solely. As Qanon picked up steam, rising skepticism over the motives of Diaz, Rogers, and the opposite early Qanon supporters led some within the internet’s conspiracy circles to turn their paranoia on the group.

Just lately, some Qanon followers have accused Diaz and Rogers of profiting from the motion by soliciting donations from their followers. There isn’t any direct proof that the group or any particular person members are behind it. These accusations have led Diaz and Rogers to both deny that they’re Q and say they don’t know who Q is. Different professional-Trump online teams have questioned the roles that Diaz and Rogers have performed in selling Q, pointing to a sequence of slip-ups that they say show Rogers and Diaz might have been concerned in the speculation from the beginning. Still, Qanon skeptics have pointed to 2 movies as evidence that Rogers had insider knowledge of Q’s account.